Ajio IQC: missing back angle and duplicate images
What you see
Your IQC rejection names a missing back angle, duplicate images, or both.
What it means
The gallery does not give Ajio a complete set of distinct product views. Either the required back view is absent or two image slots resolve to the same visual asset.
Why it happens
A back image can be missing from the source catalogue, mapped into the wrong slot, or replaced by a repeated front or detail image. Different image URLs can still be duplicates if they serve the same file.
Image review also interacts with product data. For a set, Ajio compares what the gallery shows with Net Quantity, Package Contains and Component Count. A kurta, pant and dupatta shown together should be described as three components.
How to fix it
Review the entire gallery as images, not only as URLs:
- Confirm that a clear, distinct back view is present.
- Compare each image visually and remove repeats.
- Check that every declared component appears in the gallery.
- Make Net Quantity, Package Contains and Component Count agree with what is shown.
- Replace only the rejected image values inside the owning feed's correction file.
The source observations do not establish a universal required-angle count for every brick. Use the current template and any IQC note for the category rather than inventing extra views.
How to avoid it next time
- Inspect the rendered gallery before upload.
- Detect visual duplicates, not only duplicate URLs.
- Require a distinct back view in the source handoff.
- Reconcile set components against the images and quantity fields.
Related: Ajio pre-upload checklist · Choosing the right Ajio brick
Last verified 26 August 2026. IQC image requirements can vary by category and change without notice.
HyndBrain validates product galleries alongside catalogue data. Talk to us.